Jump to content

Talk:Belgium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleBelgium is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 4, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
June 22, 2005Featured article reviewDemoted
August 16, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 21, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
November 12, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
June 21, 2007Featured article reviewKept
August 10, 2007Featured article reviewKept
August 2, 2011Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 4, 2004, October 4, 2007, October 4, 2008, October 4, 2009, October 4, 2010, July 21, 2011, July 21, 2012, and July 21, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article


Glaring Omission?

[edit]

No mention of the London Conference (1830) and the Treaty of London (1839) that created Belgium? The treaty by which Belgium "...became internationally recognised as the Kingdom of Belgium."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Conference_of_1830

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_London_(1839)

I have not done any article-archaeology to see it if was mentioned before, and was edited out for some reason, but let's say I find it very surprising, but not eunexpected.

Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2024

[edit]

There is 30,000 Romani people in Belgium. Add this information to the demographics section.

Source: https://minorityrights.org/country/belgium/ 174.243.152.88 (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. Perhaps helpful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people_in_Belgium --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 18:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No specific edit requested. Requests should be "please add this sentence in this specific location", not "please add information about this". If any autoconfirmed user wants to add this on their own initiative, feel free. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

City of Brussels

[edit]

I clicked on the capital of Belgium which was City of Brussels and not just Brussels. So what's the difference with that? They are not the same thing. City of Brussels seems to have too little content compared to Brussels. 180.244.133.42 (talk) 14:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Brussels is a municipality of Belgium, aka area administered as a city, and it is "actual" Brussels. The page titled "Brussels" is about the entire region of the same name, which consists of many more municipalities than the city itself. Weirdly, it is the city that gets the prefix "city of" and the region is called just "Brussels". This is likely because the entire Brussels region is a metropolitan area, which is often termed a city. Felleno (talk) 06:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The word "city" has several related meanings in modern English. Most commonly in modern English it refer to a large, relatively concentrated settlement, bigger than a town. Brussels, meaning all of it, is one urban area, and commonly referred to as a city. To argue that Brussels is smaller than Antwerp because it has multiple administrations goes beyond the possibilities that the English language allows, except in deliberately confusing jokes. In reality, London was called a city (one city) even when it had more than one administration. I have never seen London or Brussels referred to as multiple "cities". A less common meaning of city in some contexts would be a single council district or municipality, but this secondary meaning tends to be avoided in any contexts where it could cause confusion. For example, people would tend to say "I am going to make the whole city council aware" instead of "I am going to make the whole city aware". English speakers would normally realise that these sentences would have two different meanings.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A municipality is either a group of settlements or one single settlement according to Belgian law. Therefore the municipality of Brussels is the actual city known as Brussels, while the Brussels region is a large, metropolitan administrative area, which can be unofficially referred to as a city.
However ignoring all of the above, the current article's revision is plain wrong, as text "Brussels" in the infobox links to the City of Brussels, which is nowhere near as large as the Brussels region, to which the infobox should link in the first place if we consider it a city. Felleno (talk) 12:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously we have to write based on English common usage and not technocratic definitions in other languages. OTOH I have fixed the wikilinks. I think you are right about the distinction between the two definitions of Brussels in the infobox. A very Belgian problem that the one with "capital" in its official name is not the capital! LOL --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: Bélgica

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Bélgica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) currently redirects here. A hatnote needs to address this.

Please add:

{{redirect|Bélgica|other uses|Belgica (disambiguation)}}

-- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 11:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 06:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit request: Belgique

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Belgique (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) currently redirects here. There exists Belgique (disambiguation). The hatnote needs to be corrected to address this.

Please change:

{{Redirect|Belgique|the city in the United States|Belgique, Missouri}}

To:

{{Redirect|Belgique|other uses|Belgique (disambiguation)}}

-- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done PianoDan (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit request: Belgia

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Belgia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) currently redirects here. The current hatnote needs to be adjusted to address the existence of the passenger ship SS Belgia.

Please change:

{{Redirect|Belgia|the predecessor as an Ancient Roman province|Gallia Belgica}}

to:

{{Redirect|Belgia|the predecessor as an Ancient Roman province|Gallia Belgica|the passenger ship|SS Belgia}}

-- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 06:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Brabant Revolution and loss of land

[edit]

I'd say it's pretty important to go into more detail about the Brabantian Revolution and the fact that Belgium were semi-autonomous during most of the 18th century.

Also a specific mention of how Belgium were forced to give up Luxembourg and Limburg in 1839. Noubit (talk) 09:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those sound like reasonable proposals. Not sure if I will get a chance today so if anyone else wants to...?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]